Is there a reason that the historical and current functional physics models as "conventional" flow positive?
When I was a child I was taught that "the flow of electrons" was how electricity worked. Then I went to college and everything was modeled as "conventional Current "in physics classes. I heard the historical story of Benjamin Franklin and arbitrairly choose the wrong way to be cargo moving and such ... however, must be any real advantage to this crazy way of modeling today, as if the protons are compressed through the cables. Im really stuck on this. I have been a Force Electronics Technical Aviation and now teaches High School Physics, however, this question has bothered me a lot over the years in May. I have only received responses like: "Well, everything works mathematically, what it does. However, just hate the idea that an arbitrary error of more than a century to launch the fields full of thought that have never tried to reflect the physical reality, mathematics modeling.
Nope. Ben just got it wrong. When he arrived with "positive" and "negative" was not even thinking in terms of the current way we do today. Franklin had a "fluid theory 'of electricity, but very different in scope, with everything that happens. It was not until 1897 that the discovery of the electron. So, Ben, can be forgiven. While working, wrote in a letter: "I think a lack of words here and much doubt whether I can make this intelligible, and is assumed to have developed a variety of terms in use battery power * * * * * more driver capacitor less positively * * * * Negatively flow induced by POSITVE is useful because it maintains a lot of positive quantities. (Although I confess, a graduate of physics at school who always used little movement of electrons.) Also moving protons are good if you want to use special relativity to show that electricy and magnetism are the same.
WWII In Colour - Battle Of Britain in Motion - Flying Legends - Spitfire,Bf109,Hurricane,Heinkel111
